-
WHY YOU SHOULD BECOME A MEMBERBy becoming a member of The Heritage Foundation with your tax-deductible gift of $25 or more, you will join hundreds of thousands of conservatives around the nation in supporting our work to build an America where freedom, prosperity, opportunity and civil society flourish.
Since 1973, we have been working to advance the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense.
Our hard work has paid off time and again. Since our founding, we have seen substantial gains for the conservative agenda and The Heritage Foundation has swelled to include nearly 400,000 members. In fact, our work would not have been possible without our members’ support.
» Read more about Heritage’s achievements
-
President Obama’s Plan for Government Debt and Dependency9/28/2009President Obama has explained that, “We cannot, and will not, sustain deficits like these without end,” and that we cannot, “simply spend as we please and defer the consequences to the next budget, the next administration, or the next generation.” But his strong and urgent verbiage seem lost on the stubborn budgetary numbers. In fact, spending has gotten so out of control that Congress will soon have to raise the total national debt limit just to not default on its bills.
The White House's mid-session budget review recently forecast that President Barack Obama's budget would create $9 trillion in new budget deficits over the next decade. This is on top of our existing debt, and more debt than America accumulated from 1789 through 2008 combined!
But it gets worse. The White House conveniently did not include the costs of a cap-and-trade system, the costly health care reform bill, extending “expiring” entitlements, as well as expenses incurred on the interest of the debt and more realistic interest rates. A more realistic budget deficit number would be $13 trillion over the next decade – making for a grand total of $20 trillion in national debt by 2019, which is nearly 100 percent of our gross domestic product (GDP). To put it into perspective, that’s more than $37,000 spent per household in 2019, compared with $25,000 per household in 2008.
The President has shirked his professed duty to clean up the budget and eliminate wasteful spending, and there is perhaps no more troubling amount of spending than what he has in store for welfare programs. Over the next decade (2009-2018) Obama will spend a staggering $10.3 trillion on welfare programs, including cash, food, housing, medical care and targeted social services for poor and low income Americans. President Obama will spend twice as much on welfare as President Clinton did, after adjusting for inflation.
Here are the pertinent facts on welfare spending:
- Over the next decade welfare spending will amount to around $300,000 for each person currently living in poverty, and $1.5 trillion for low skill immigrants.
- Obama will spend more on welfare in a single year (FY2010) than Bush spent on the Iraq war during his entire presidency.
- In 2010, welfare spending will cost each U.S. household $638 per month or $7,600 per year.
- The Census Bureau (which measures poverty) counts only four percent of total welfare spending as income when it calculates poverty and inequality in the U.S. Thus, statistics on the inequality of the rich and poor in America are grossly skewed.
Welfare spending at such a level embodies a gradual shift leftwards for America and it is the most apt example of a government premised on encouraging dependency while curbing initiative and freedom. Coupled with the overall budget picture – $13 trillion in deficit spending over the next ten years – more welfare spending is a poorly conceived remedy to the often overstated problem of poverty in America. Make sure to go here, to learn more about the pitfalls of welfare spending, and to read more about the projected budget deficits and what the President and his team missed go here.
Question 1 Yesterday, President Obama delivered a major speech on education in an effort to garner support for his Race to the Top grant program and his push for national education standards and tests. The President’s remarks came on the heels of a speech delivered by Education Secretary Arne Duncan on Tuesday at the National Press Club, during which Duncan attempted to paint the Administration’s policies as part of a “quiet revolution.”
Question 2 Over the last four weeks, The Heritage Foundation sent multiple teams of respected energy, environment, homeland security and response experts to the Gulf to study the federal response to the oil spill. These three delegations, with more to come, have traversed the areas hit hardest by the crisis, talking to response workers, affected oil crews, fishermen, elected leaders and BP representatives. What we found is simple: President Obama’s administration has turned a crisis into a disaster, and someone needs to be held accountable.
Question 3 At the height of the debate over Obamacare, when the White House's leftist allies were in full panic mode, The Washington Post's Ezra Klein accused Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) of being "willing to cause the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people." Lieberman's crime? He opposed including an expansion of Medicare in the health regulation bill. Now that the President's signature foreign policy achievement, the New START nuclear agreement with Russia, is on the ropes, the left is again back to their hyperbolic ways. Ploughshares Fund president Joseph Cirincione told The Associated Press last week: "A delayed ratification with a close vote would be a blow to U.S. leadership around the world. People would doubt the President's ability to negotiate other agreements."
Please leave this field empty
