-
WHY YOU SHOULD BECOME A MEMBERBy becoming a member of The Heritage Foundation with your tax-deductible gift of $25 or more, you will join hundreds of thousands of conservatives around the nation in supporting our work to build an America where freedom, prosperity, opportunity and civil society flourish.
Since 1973, we have been working to advance the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense.
Our hard work has paid off time and again. Since our founding, we have seen substantial gains for the conservative agenda and The Heritage Foundation has swelled to include nearly 400,000 members. In fact, our work would not have been possible without our members’ support.
» Read more about Heritage’s achievements
-
What Budget Gimmicks are Liberals Using to Pass Their Agenda?10/26/2009The “Doc Fix” Bill
Last week the Senate took its first floor vote on Obamacare, on a bill that would have increased Medicare payments to doctors at a cost of $247 billion over 10 years.
The “doc fix” bill, was part of a sneaky liberal strategy to pass President Barack Obama’s $1 trillion-plus health care overhaul by transferring a quarter of its cost into a separate, and completely unpaid for, bill. The White House thought that if it bought off all of the business interests involved, opposition to the plan would whither. In one sense, the plan worked—Washington lobbyists for drug companies, insurance giants and hospitals have all spent millions of dollars for lobbying and television ads in support of Obamacare.
However, these special interest television ads failed to rid Americans of their common sense objections to a government takeover of health care. $247 billion is a lot of money—far too much to be blindly charged to the deficit, and way too much to be considered outside the context of the larger health care reform bill. Luckily, this dishonest shell game was too much for a majority of the Senators, and the procedural vote failed by 13 votes.
The TARP Slush Fund
Remember last year’s Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP)? The program was intended to preserve America’s financial structure through the purchase of troubled or “toxic” mortgages and other securities, but it has since been used for a host of other purposes – most notoriously the bailout of Chrysler and General Motors.
And last week the White House announced yet another political priority for which the funds would be used. President Barack Obama announced that his administration would shift TARP’s $700 billion bailout fund away from big financial institutions and toward small businesses through small banks. Specifically, the Treasury Department will offer capital from TARP, at a 3% rate, to viable banks with less than $1 billion in assets.
First under the Bush administration and now under Obama, TARP has become a slush fund for pet political priorities. And as the New York Times reports, this time it is even being used to influence votes in Congress:
What is striking about the S.B.A. initiatives is not just the size of the increases but whom they appear meant to impress. The new loan limits closely track increases proposed by Olympia Snowe, the senator from Maine who is both the ranking Republican on the Senate Small Business Committee and possibly the only Republican considering voting for Democratic-led health care reform.
Fuzzy Math on the Stimulus Bill
The Obama Administration announced last week that federal economic recovery aid has created or saved 250,000 education jobs. However, as the Washington Post notes, these figures are preliminary estimates. One education official even admitted that the stimulus’ effect was “mostly saving jobs, as opposed to creating new jobs,” and that the larger class sizes across the country showed that many jobs were not saved.
The reality is that the Obama administration’s stimulus job numbers can not be trusted. When the White House was pitching its plan to the American people, it produced a report claiming the stimulus would keep the unemployment rate below 8%. And what do the Bureau of Labor and Statistics numbers actually show? A 26-year record high 9.8% unemployment rate. Last January, the Obama administration claimed the stimulus would create 4 million jobs by the end of 2010 – those jobs are yet to be seen.
Question 1
Question 2 In yesterday's New York Times, International Herald Tribune columnist Roger Cohen reported: "Since taking office, President Obama has reached out to the Muslim world as a whole, to China, to Turkey and to Iran, but has devoted scant serious diplomatic energy to Europe." Cohen then went on to quote prominent Paris-based defense analyst Camille Grand: "Europe is the object of benign U.S. neglect. Obama has not established or re-established a strategic relationship with any single European country or with Europe as a whole."
Question 3 According to the Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll released today, only 26 percent of voters think the economy is going to be better in the next year, and 61 percent think the country is on the wrong track. Desperate to show Americans he's fighting "every single day, every single hour, every single minute" to turn the economy around, President Barack Obama unveiled yet another economic stimulus spending plan yesterday. This time the President is promising to spend $50 billion over six years on a "Race to the Top"-style transportation pork plan that will fund pet leftist projects like high-speed rail. The President promised: "this will not only create jobs immediately, it’s also going to make our economy hum over the long haul."
Please leave this field empty
